Description of biotope or habitat type
To understand more about what this page is describing, see How to use the classification. See also How to cite.
Nephtys cirrosa-dominated littoral fine sand
Physical habitat description
Salinity | Full (30-35 ppt), Variable (18-35 ppt) |
---|---|
Wave exposure | Moderately exposed, Sheltered, Very sheltered, Extremely sheltered |
Tidal streams | |
Substratum | medium to fine sand |
Zone | |
Depth Band | Lower shore, Mid shore |
Other Features |
Download comparative physical and biological data. The comparative tables enable a rapid comparison of the species composition and principal physical characteristics between a given set of biotopes.

- Records used to define the biotope (core records)
- Other records assigned to this biotope, marked as 'certain'
- Other records assigned to this biotope, marked as 'uncertain'
Point data based on records in the UK Marine Recorder Snapshot.
Description
This biotope occurs mainly on the mid and lower shore on moderately wave-exposed and sheltered coasts, with medium to fine clean sand which remains damp throughout the tidal cycle and contains little organic matter. The sediment is not usually well sorted and may contain a fraction of coarse sand. It is often rippled and typically lacks an anoxic sub-surface layer. The polychaete infauna is dominated by Nephtys cirrosa, Magelona mirabilis, Spio martinensis, Spiophanes bombyx and Paraonis fulgens. The presence of polychaetes may be seen as coloured burrows running down from the surface of the sediment. Nemertean worms may be present. The amphipods Pontocrates spp. and Bathyporeia spp., as well as Cumopsis goodsir and the shrimp Crangon crangon are typically present. The bivalve Macomangulus tenuis is scarce or absent.
Situation
Po.Ncir may be present higher up on the shore than Po.Aten, or lower down than AmSco.Eur or Ol.FS.
Temporal variation
The infaunal community of this biotope may change seasonally, as increased storminess during winter months may reduce sediment stability and the ability of some species to survive. Some species, such as the shrimp C. crangon avoid these conditions by seasonal migration to deeper water (Moore, 1991).
Characterising species
Taxon | Relative importance of taxon for defining this community (%) | Typical abundance - SACFOR scale | Typical abundance - (count per m2) | % of core records where taxon was recorded |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nephtys cirrosa | 30 | Common | 79 | 81-100% |
Magelona mirabilis | 11 | Frequent | 206 | 61-80% |
Cumopsis goodsir | 9 | Frequent | 76 | 41-60% |
Spio martinensis | 9 | Common | 279 | 41-60% |
Spiophanes bombyx | 9 | Frequent | 55 | 61-80% |
Nephtys | 6 | Common | 73 | 41-60% |
Pontocrates arenarius | 4 | 36 | 61-80% | |
Bathyporeia elegans | 2 | Common | 31 | 21-40% |
Bathyporeia pelagica | 2 | 48 | 21-40% | |
Crangon crangon | 2 | 17 | 41-60% | |
Nemertea | 2 | 10 | 41-60% | |
Paraonis fulgens | 2 | Common | 16 | 21-40% |
Macomangulus tenuis | 1 | 6 | 21-40% | |
Bathyporeia sarsi | 1 | 13 | 21-40% | |
Pontocrates altamarinus | 1 | 16 | 21-40% |
Similar biotopes or habitat types
LS.LSa.FiSa.Po.Mten
Occurs in slightly finer sediments, which are more stable and therefore support bivalves, especially A. tenuis, in addition to a range of polychaete species.
LS.LSa.FiSa.Po.Pful
Occurs higher on the shore. Nephtys spp. are scarce or absent, the infauna is dominated by P. fulgens.Classification history of this biotope or habitat type
Classification version | Code |
---|---|
1997 (97.06) | LGS.AP.P (part) |